Download Service »
micro resist technology GmbH
The most frequently asked questions about our products:
1) Are there resists for other film thicknesses available?
In general we offer ready–to-use resists for the film thicknesses
given in the spin curves. Thinner film thicknesses can be obtained
by diluting the resists with the recommended thinner (solvent mixture).
We guarantee unchanged resist properties of the ready-to-use resists
during the expiration date and by storage the resists at the recommended
storage conditions.
2) Can the resists be used for film preparation by spray coating?
In general the resists were designed for film preparation by spin
coating. Film preparation by spray coating should also be possible,
but up to now we are not able to give guidelines for this method.
3) For which applications do you recommend ma-N 400 or ma-N 1400?
Both resist series differ in their available film thickness regions,
their sensitivity, in the thermal stability of the resist patterns
and in the profile of the undercutted patterns. For pattern transfer
processes via PVD (physical vapour deposition) and lift-off the ma-N
400 is recommended for pattern transfer via evaporation and sputtering
with low thermal impact. ma-N 1400 is recommend for sputtering processes
at higher temperatures.
4) What is the difference between the single layer negative resist systems ma-N 400 or ma-N 1400 and a bilayer system, e.g. LOR and a positive tone photoresist, for a pattern transfer process via lift-off, and what is the possible resolution of both systems?
For the lithographic processing of the single layer resist systems
ma-N 400 and ma-N 1400 less processing steps are necessary than for
the bilayer system. The thermal stability of the ma-N 1400 is higher
than that of the ma-N 400 series and of the bilayer system. In general,
the resolution of both systems, the single layer and the bilayer
system is comparable, but the resolution of the bilayer system can
slightly be better.
For clean lift-off processing, the film thickness should be 1.5 to
2 times that of the metal deposition layer.
5) What is the difference between the material systems Epocore/ Epoclad and Ormocore/ Ormoclad for the manufacture of polymer based waveguides?
Both material systems are composed of different chemical components.
For a detailed comparison of both material systems, of the lithographic
processing and the properties of the manufactured waveguides see
the attached pdf document.
Summary in PDF »
6) Which adhesion promoter is suitable for which substrate (silicon Si, silicondioxide SiO2, glass, copper Cu or gold Au) and resist material?
| Product | Si | SiO2, glass | Au | Cu |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ma-N 2400 | HMDS | HMDS | - | - |
| ma-N 400 | HMDS | HMDS | - | - |
| ma-N 1400 | HMDS | HMDS | - | - |
| mr-UVL 6000 | - | - | - | Omnicoat (optional) |
| mr-EBL 6000 | - | - | - | Omnicoat (optional) |
| Epocore/ Epoclad | - | - | - | Omnicoat (optional) |
| XP mr-P 15 AV | - | - | - | - |
In any case the substrates have to be free of impurities and moisture. They should
be baked at 200 °C and cooled down to room temperature immediately before
coating. Alternatively, oxygen or ozone plasma cleaning is recommended.
For
improving the resist film adhesion to semiconductor substrates, e.g. FR 4,
or for applying multiple coating and patterning of resist films, e.g. with
Epoclad/ Epocore/ Epoclad, a short oxygen plasma activation step is recommended.
7) How can strongly crosslinked ma-N 2400, ma-N 400 and ma-N 1400 resist films be removed?
The ready-to-use removers mr-Rem 660 (solvent based) and ma-R 404/ S (strongly
alkaline) are recommended for the remove of the resists. Using mr-Rem 660 the
remove can be done ultrasonic-assisted and at higher temperatures between 40
and 60 °C.
For the residue-free remove of during the pattern transfer process strongly crosslinked
ma-N 2400, ma-N 400 or ma-N 1400 films an oxygen plasma step is highly recommended.
8) Are there data available for the high etch resistance of the ma-N 2400, ma-N 400 and ma-N 1400 series?
In general the resists exhibit a good etch resistance.
The series gave good
results in dry etching (e.g. with CF4 or high dry density SF6/
O2 plasma).
The etch rates of the resists strongly depend on the etching conditions. The
etching equipment has an influence, the amount of open wafer surface to be
etched, the etch gas composition and all other parameters such as pressure,
temperature or voltage.
If required, the etch resistance and thermal stability of the resist can be
increased by applying a higher prebake temperature or a longer prebake time.
The developing time will increase in this case. Hardbaking of the developed
resist patterns is also recommended for an increase of the etch resistance
and the thermals stability.
We cannot deliver any more detailed data. This is nearly impossible since etching
conditions can differ very much from lab to lab.
9) Is there a resist available which is suitable for pattern transfer via HF-etch?
HF etching is a bit demanding. HF doesn´t attack the resist. But it can
diffuse through and under the photoresist and lift it from below causing bad
adhesion of the resist on the substrate. This is why a film thickness as high
as possible should be chosen, and the resist should be hardened (stronger prebake
+ hardbake). Nevertheless it depends strongly on the HF concentration and the
etch time how acceptably the photoresist sustains the etching.
10) Is there any literature available about the use/ processing or application of the resists ma-N 400, ma-N 1400, ma-N 2400, mr-EBL 6000, Epocore/ Epoclad or mr-P 15AV?
ma-N 2400:
a) A. Voigt, H. Elsner, H.-G. Meyer, G. Gruetzner “Nanometer patterning
using ma-N 2400 series DUV negative photoresist and electron beam lithography“ Proc.
SPIE 3676 (1999), 485–491
b) H. Elsner, H.-G. Meyer, A. Voigt, G. Gruetzner “Evaluation of the ma-N
2400 series DUV photoresists for the electron beam exposure“ Microelectron.
Eng. 46 (1999), 389–392
c) H. Elsner, H.-G. Meyer: Microelectronic Engineering Vol.57-58 (2001), 291
- 296
ma-N 400/ ma-N 1400:
a) A. Voigt, G. Gruetzner, E. Sauer, S. Helm, T. Harder, S. Fehlberg, J. Bendig „A
series of AZ-compatible negative photoresists“ Proc. SPIE 2348 (1995),
413–420
b) A. Voigt, M. Heinrich, K. Hauck, R. Mientus, G. Gruetzner, M. Töpper,
O. Ehrmann „A Single Layer Negative Tone Lift-Off Photo Resist for Patterning
a Magnetron Sputtered Ti/Pt/Au Contact System and for Solder Bumps“ Microelectron.
Eng. 69 (2004)
EpoCore/ EpoClad:
a) R. Himmelhuber, M. Fink, K. Pfeiffer, U. Ostrzinski, A. Klukowska, G. Gruetzner,
R. Houbertz, H. Wolter „Innovative materials tailored for advanced microoptic
applications“ SPIE Photonics West 20 -25 Januar 2007 San Josa California
USA
XP mr-P 15 AV:
a) Anja Voigt, Marina Heinrich, Gabi Gruetzner “Characterization of new
ultra thick chemically amplified positive tone photoresists suitable for electroplating
application“ Proc. SPIE 5376 (2004), 915
